Home / Methodology

Methodology

Blockers, Assets, Waves.The method behind every engagement.

An audit that only lists problems produces paralysis. Mine identifies what blocks you, then what you already own but never activate, then the order to move in.

The principle

Why three moves instead of a list

Most SEO audits are an inventory of faults sorted by technical category. The client receives eighty pages, retains the anxiety, and executes nothing. The diagnostic quality is rarely the problem: an inventory simply doesn’t say where to start.

I work the other way round. Blockers are ranked by real severity, not by technical family. Assets already in place but unused are identified separately, because they produce results faster than anything built from scratch. And the plan is sequenced in waves, so a team can actually run it.

How it runs

The three moves

01

Blockers

What holds visibility back today

I start from buying intent, not from the site. Which queries bring a buyer ready to contact you? Who already owns them? Everything I surface is graded across three levels — critical, important, to verify — so the trade-off is obvious.

  • Intent mapping and competitive field
  • Technical, content, structured data and authority review
  • Visibility inside generative engines
  • Ranked by severity, not by technical family
02

Assets

What you already own but never activate

This is the part classic audits skip, and often the one that produces the first results. A well-rated Google listing disconnected from the site, videos without transcripts, client logos sitting idle, a certification never surfaced: authority already earned and never plugged in.

  • Inventory of existing authority signals
  • Content produced but never used in search
  • Proof and references to convert into authority
  • Missing connections between assets and the site
03

Waves

The order to move in

A plan you can’t execute is worthless. I deliver a page architecture built on intent × segment × territory, cut into successive waves, with a debrief so the team understands the reasoning and not just the list.

  • Page architecture by intent and segment
  • Cut into successive waves
  • What sits with you, what sits with me
  • Debrief session and tracking markers

How I read the data

Four readings that change decisions

The diagrams below illustrate no achieved result. They show the reasoning applied to every engagement.

Explanatory diagram — illustrative data

Buying intent versus search volume

High volume attracts; intent converts.

Explanatory diagram — illustrative data

Ranking the blockers

High impact at low effort comes first.

Explanatory diagram — illustrative data

Impressions and clicks over time

Impressions rise before clicks: the first reliable signal.

Explanatory diagram — illustrative data

Dormant assets to reconnect

The authority already exists; it just isn’t plugged in.

Markers

What the first months look like

These markers are indicative. A technically sound site and steady execution speed up the curve; a heavy site or a stretched team slow it down.

0–2 months

Foundations

Audit, priority technical fixes, structure and structured data. Barely visible from outside, decisive for what follows.

3–6 months

Progress

First-wave pages start ranking. Impressions rise before clicks — that’s normal, and it’s the first reliable signal.

6–12 months

Consolidation

Positions hold, return on investment becomes measurable, second wave in production.

What I don’t promise

What the commitment covers

No ranking can be guaranteed, by anyone. Algorithms shift, competitors move, and part of the outcome depends on no supplier at all. My commitment is to method and execution: a ranked diagnostic, an executable plan, tracking that separates what moved from what didn’t, and a clear explanation behind every recommendation.

Next step

Let’s talk about your situation

Thirty minutes to review where you stand on Google and AI search, and see whether this method fits your context. No commitment.

Pick a time